Kunal Kunal v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 6, 202520-73284California612 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 6 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KUNAL KUNAL, No. 20-73284
Petitioner, Agency No. A215-666-742
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 4, 2025** Seattle, Washington
Before: HAWKINS, GOULD, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Kunal Kunal, a native and citizen of India, seeks review of the
decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the order of an
immigration judge (“IJ”) denying Kunal’s motion to reopen his removal proceedings
and rescind his in absentia removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1252 and review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion.…