Kunal Kunal v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 6, 202520-73284California612 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 6 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KUNAL KUNAL, No. 20-73284

Petitioner, Agency No. A215-666-742

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 4, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, GOULD, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Kunal Kunal, a native and citizen of India, seeks review of the

decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the order of an

immigration judge (“IJ”) denying Kunal’s motion to reopen his removal proceedings

and rescind his in absentia removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1252 and review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.