McGee

McGee v. The City of Hercules

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20253:23-cv-05161California486 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANTHONY MCGEE, Case No. 23-cv-05161-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

SEAL

THE CITY OF HERCULES, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 71 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Anthony McGee has filed a motion to seal, which the Court construes as a motion to seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5. ECF No. 71. “[T]he courts of this country recognize a general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.” Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978) (footnote omitted). Although that right is not absolute, “‘a strong presumption in favor of access’ is the starting point.” Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)). This presumption “is ‘based on the need for federal courts, although independent— indeed, particularly because they…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.