Whitfield

Whitfield v. Saleh

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20251:22-cv-00141California4,063 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 STEVEN WHITFIELD, Case No. 1:22-cv-00141-KES-CDB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO GRANT INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE

TO AMEND

KHALIB SALEH, et al., (Doc. 23) Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 13 Pending before the undersigned is the unopposed motion of individual Defendants Kimberly Long and Darrell Long (“individual Defendants”) to dismiss the complaint against them, filed on June 2, 2023. (Doc. 23). The undersigned deems the motion suitable for the preparation of findings and recommendations without hearing and oral argument. See E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(g). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will recommend the individual Defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted without leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND2 A. Procedural History Plaintiff Steven Whitfield, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this action with the filing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.