Marvin L. Stewart v. Gavin Newsome
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
JS-
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
11 MARVIN L. STEWART, Case № 2:24-cv-08519-ODW (AGRx)
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING v.
DEFENDANTS’
14 GAVIN NEWSOME et al., MOTION TO DISMISS [18] 15 Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Marvin L. Stewart, pro se, brings this action seeking declaratory and 19 injunctive relief against Defendants California Governor Gavin Newsome and 20 Attorney General Robert Andres Bonta, in their official capacities. (First Am. Compl. 21 (“FAC”) ¶¶ 1–2, 13–14, ECF No. 14.) Defendants move to dismiss Stewart’s claims 22 under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule” or “Rules”) 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and 23 8(a)(2). (Mot. Dismiss (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 18.) For the reasons below, 24 the Court GRANTS the Motion.1 25 26
28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. …