Bhs Law LLP v. Jipyong LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BHS LAW LLP, Case No. 25-cv-04328-AMO
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING TEMPORARY
v. RESTRAINING ORDER
JIPYONG LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 8 Defendants.
12 On June 2, 2025, Plaintiff Bhs Law LLP (“Bhs”) filed an ex parte motion for temporary restraining order (“TRO”) seeking to enjoin Defendants Jipyong LLC and Jinhee Kim from engaging in the unauthorized practice of law. ECF 8. The Court ordered Defendants to file any opposition by June 5, 2025, and set a hearing for June 9, 2025. ECF 9. Having reviewed the papers filed by the parties and the arguments made therein, as well as the relevant legal authority, the Court finds the motion appropriate for decision without oral argument, and VACATES the hearing set for June 9, 2025. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). A temporary restraining order is “an ‘extraordinary and drastic remedy,” that is never awarded as of right.” Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc., 493 F.…