Bustamonte

Bustamonte v. Castillon

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20255:22-cv-04725California4,479 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ISRAEL BUSTAMONTE, Case No. 22-cv-04725-VKD (PR)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS'

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT

T. CASTILLON, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 70 Defendants.

13 Pro se plaintiff Israel Bustamonte, a state prisoner, asserts claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants T. Castillon, F. Ssempebwa, P. Le, F. Montegrande, L. Muriithi, and Dr. Michael Moeller1 for use of excessive force and deliberate indifference to serious medical needs at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”). Dkt. No. 11. Mr. Bustamonte seeks declaratory relief and damages. Id. at 23-24. The Court found the amended complaint (Dkt. No. 11), liberally construed, stated cognizable claims and ordered service on named defendants. Dkt. No. 14 at 5-6. All parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Dkt. Nos. 4, 24, 38, 84. Defendants Castillon, Ssempebwa, Le, and Muriithi…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.