Mullin

Mullin v. City of Mountain View, California

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20255:25-cv-02191California1,848 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 TYGHE JAMES MULLIN, Case No. 25-cv-02191-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING PLAINTIFF’S

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

v. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915;

STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S

CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW, ADDITIONAL FILINGS; AND CALIFORNIA, et al., DIRECTING THE CITY TO FILE A STATUS REPORT RE SERVICE Defendants. [Re: ECF 23]

12 Plaintiff Tyghe James Mullin is proceeding in this case pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”). He sues the City of Mountain View (“the City”) and a number of law enforcement officers employed by the Mountain View Police Department (“MVPD”) for alleged violations of his federal and state constitutional rights. The Court screened and dismissed Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) with leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). See Order, ECF 17. Plaintiff timely filed a second amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.