Nese

Nese v. Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20255:25-cv-04700California723 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ALPER NESE, Case No. 25-cv-04700-BLF

Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED

v. IN FORMA PAUPERIS; SCREENING

PETITION; AND DISMISSING

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, PETITION WITHOUT LEAVE TO

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, AMEND

12 Respondent. [Re: ECF 1, 2]

14 Petitioner Alper Nese, proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for Writ of Mandate and Emergency Stay, and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). See Petition, ECF 1; IFP Application, ECF 2. The Court is satisfied that IFP status is warranted based on Petitioner’s affidavit describing his lack of financial resources. Accordingly, Petitioner’s application to proceed IFP is GRANTED. When a district court grants IFP status, it must screen the pleading and dismiss the action if it “is frivolous or malicious,” “fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.