Cisco

Carlos Montras Montague, Jr. v. Cisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 4, 20255:25-cv-00507California299 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 5:25-cv-00507-CV-E Date: June 4, 2025 Title: Carlos Montras Montague, Jr. v. Cisco, et al.

Present: The Honorable CYNTHIA VALENZUELA, U.S. District Judge

Jessica Cortes Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present

Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILING TO

FILE A COMPLETE IN FORMA PAUPERIS

REQUEST OR PAY FILING FEE

All parties instituting a civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States must pay a filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party’s failure to pay the filing fee only if the party is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). However, prisoners must still pay the filing fee but may do so through monthly installment payments if granted in forma pauperis status. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b).

On April 7, 2025, the Court postponed ruling on Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis request (“Request”) because it was incomplete. Dkt. 4. The Court directed him to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.