Warden

(HC) Teeple v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20251:25-cv-00412California824 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NATHAN R. TEEPLE, Case No. 1:25-cv-00412-SAB-HC

Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS PETITION FOR WRIT OF

v. HABEAS CORPUS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

WARDEN, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT

Respondent. JUDGE

17 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On April 9, 2025, Petitioner filed the instant petition wherein he challenges his continued confinement, arguing that he is entitled to immediate transfer to a pre-release facility. (ECF No. 1 at 1.1) Petitioner argues that because the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) “refuses to follow numerous courts decision [sic] since 2022 it would be a futile gesture to try and exhaust my administrative remedies.” (ECF No. 1 at 3–4.) On April 11, 2025, the Court ordered Petitioner to show cause why the petition should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.