Epifanio Choc v. Airstream Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20258:25-cv-00976California631 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. 8:25-cv-00976-KES Date: June 6, 2025

Title: EPIFANIO CHOC v. AIRSTREAM INC., et al.

PRESENT:

THE HONORABLE KAREN E. SCOTT, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Jazmin Dorado Not Present Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR

PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANTS:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): Order to Show Cause Why Case Should Not be Dismissed or Remanded for Lack of Federal Jurisdiction

The Court may sua sponte raise the issue of subject matter jurisdiction at any time during an action. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Hughes, 358 F.3d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir. 2004); Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). On September 30, 2024, Plaintiff Epifanio Choc (“Plaintiff”) sued Defendant Airstream Inc. (“Airstream”) and Does 1-100 in Orange County Superior Court (“OCSC”). (Dkt. 1-1 (Complaint).) Plaintiff alleges that in November 2022 while working as a roofer, he was walking on the roof of a building in Westminster, California, owned by Airstream. (Id. ¶¶ 3, 4, 10.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.