Epifanio Choc v. Airstream Inc.
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20258:25-cv-00976California631 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No. 8:25-cv-00976-KES Date: June 6, 2025
Title: EPIFANIO CHOC v. AIRSTREAM INC., et al.
PRESENT:
THE HONORABLE KAREN E. SCOTT, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Jazmin Dorado Not Present Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR
PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANTS:
None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): Order to Show Cause Why Case Should Not be Dismissed or Remanded for Lack of Federal Jurisdiction
The Court may sua sponte raise the issue of subject matter jurisdiction at any time during an action. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Hughes, 358 F.3d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir. 2004); Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). On September 30, 2024, Plaintiff Epifanio Choc (“Plaintiff”) sued Defendant Airstream Inc. (“Airstream”) and Does 1-100 in Orange County Superior Court (“OCSC”). (Dkt. 1-1 (Complaint).) Plaintiff alleges that in November 2022 while working as a roofer, he was walking on the roof of a building in Westminster, California, owned by Airstream. (Id. ¶¶ 3, 4, 10.)…