Herr

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRYAN E. RANSOM, No. 2:20-CV-1209-DJC-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS HERR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 17, 2025, and again on April 17, 2025, mail directed to Plaintiff was returned by the United States Postal Service as undeliverable. Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 183(b), any party appearing pro se must file and serve a notice of change of address within 30 days of mail being returned. To date, more than 30 days have elapsed since mail was last returned and Plaintiff has not notified the Court of a change of address. The Court must weigh five factors before imposing the harsh sanction of dismissal. See Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). Those factors…