Brownen

(PC) Jones v. Brownen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20252:22-cv-01707California2,734 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCELL JONES, No. 2:22-cv-01707 DC SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER B. BROWNEN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court is plaintiff’s renewed motion to compel. (ECF No. 48.) For the reasons set forth below, the court grants plaintiff’s motion in part and grants defendants leave to file supplemental material to properly assert the official information privilege within thirty (30) days of this order. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND I. Plaintiff’s Request for Production This action is proceeding on plaintiff’s complaint, which the previously assigned magistrate judge determined stated a cognizable First Amendment retaliation claim against defendant Brownen and a cognizable Fourteenth Amendment Due Process claim against defendant Rangel. (ECF No. 11.) On November 8, 2024, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.