(PS) Rogers v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20252:24-cv-00475California7,157 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAULA CARRIE ROGERS, No. 2:24-cv-00475-TLN-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., (ECF No. 53) Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Paula Carrie Rogers paid the filing fee and filed this civil action without counsel. This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c)(21). Presently before the Court is defendants City of Elk Grove, Bobby Davis, Tina Durham, and Tisha Smith’s (“City defendants”) motion to dismiss plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (ECF No. 53.) Because plaintiff failed to timely file an opposition, the Court vacated the hearing set for May 21, 2025, pursuant to Local Rule 230(c). (ECF No. 55.) Plaintiff filed an opposition on April 29, 2025 (ECF No. 56) and defendants filed a reply (ECF No. 57). In the FAC, plaintiff alleges defendants discriminated against her in violation of federal and state laws during a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.