(PS) Jones v. City of Sacramento Board of Supervisors

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAHEEM JONES, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-0864-DJC-JDP (PS) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER CITY OF SACRAMENTO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 18 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 9, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed 19 findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which 20 contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be 21 filed within fourteen days. Plaintiffs filed objections on May 23, 2025, and they were 22 considered by the undersigned. 23 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 24 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law 25 are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) 26 (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the 27 district court and [the appellate] court . . .…