United States v. Steven Zinnel
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 9, 202522-16128California4,715 words
Opinion
Opinion
de Alba, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No.22-16128
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:21-mc-00098- v. TLN-AC
MICHAEL BRUMBAUGH,
Successor Trustee of The Castana OPINION Trust, Dated March 4, 2009, and Administrator of the Estate of David Zinnel,
Claimant-Appellee,
STEVEN ZINNEL,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 14, 2025* San Francisco, California
* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Filed June 9, 2025
Before: Carlos T. Bea and Ana de Alba, Circuit Judges, and Jeffrey Vincent Brown,** District Judge.
Opinion by Judge de Alba
SUMMARY***
Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act of 1990
The panel vacated the district court’s final order of garnishment in the government’s application for a writ of garnishment under the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act of 1990 (FDCPA), seeking to seize…