Bondi

Mendez Taracena v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 9, 202523-3868California950 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KARIN YULISSA MENDEZ No. 23-3868 TARACENA; A.A.R.M., Agency Nos.

A220-546-873

Petitioners, A220-546-874 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 5, 2025**

Before: SANCHEZ, H.A. THOMAS, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Karin Yulissa Mendez Taracena and her minor child, A.A.R.M., are natives

and citizens of Guatemala.1 They petition for review of the Board of Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Mendez Taracena is the lead petitioner. A.A.R.M. submitted their own application for relief based on the same events as Mendez Taracena, and is listed as a derivative beneficiary on Mendez Taracena’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.