Bondi

Giron Arreguin v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 9, 202523-3608California806 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL GIRON ARREGUIN, No. 23-3608 Agency No. Petitioner, A209-805-549 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 5, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: CALLAHAN, BADE, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Daniel Giron Arreguin (“Petitioner”), a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

dismissing an appeal from an order by an immigration judge (“IJ”) denying his

application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. §

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1252. Where, as here, the Board “conducts its own review of the evidence and

law,” the court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.