In re Johnson on Habeas Corpus CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 9, 2025F086404California4,830 words

Opinion

Opinion

Detjen, J.

INTRODUCTION

Petitioner Myron Johnson seeks to withdraw his plea of no contest to four counts of human trafficking of a minor (Pen. Code,1 § 236.1, subd. (c)(1)) on the ground his defense counsel provided ineffective assistance by misadvising him regarding his eligibility to earn good conduct credits at a rate of 50 percent (see Cal. Code Regs., tit. 15, § 3043.2, subd. (b)(3)) (sometimes referred to herein as half-time credits). He contends that, absent counsel’s misadvisement, he would not have entered the plea. We agree petitioner’s counsel provided ineffective assistance and, as a result, petitioner must be permitted to withdraw his plea.

BACKGROUND2

“Between about November 1, 2016, and December 1, 2016, [petitioner], who had a prior felony conviction, persuaded four victims under the age of 18 years to engage in commercial sex acts. “On January 20, 2017, [petitioner] possessed a firearm. “On December 8, 2017, in case No. VCF346256, the Tulare County District Attorney filed an information charging [petitioner] with 20 counts related to trafficking of a minor, pimping, and pandering against four victims. “The same day, in case No. VCF346180, an information was filed charging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.