Ragio-Conrriquez

United States v. Ragio-Conrriquez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 9, 202524-1787California1,455 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 24-1786 24-1787 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 4:23-cr-01198-JCH-LCK-1 v. 4:22-cr-01565-JCH-LCK-

CRISTIAN EMMANUEL RAGIO- MEMORANDUM*

CONRRIQUEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John Charles Hinderaker, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 5, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: CALLAHAN, BADE, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Cristian Emmanuel Ragio-Conrriquez (“Appellant”) appeals from the

district court’s judgment sentencing him to 57 months in custody and three years of

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). On May 2, 2023, Appellant was sentenced to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.