Deuschel

Deuschel v. California Health and Human Services Agency

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 9, 202524-3129California1,007 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL DEUSCHEL, No. 24-3129 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:23-cv-03458-MMC v.

MEMORANDUM*

CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND HUMAN

SERVICES AGENCY; Doctor MARK

GHALY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Maxine M. Chesney, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 23, 2025 ** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and HINDERAKER, District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable John Charles Hinderaker, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. Michael Deuschel appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his First

Amended Complaint (FAC). The district court dismissed the FAC, with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.