Albarran

Albarran v. White

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 9, 202524-2758California378 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIGUEL ALBARRAN, No. 24-2758 D.C. No. Petitioner - Appellant, 3:22-cv-05788-JNW v.

MEMORANDUM*

DAN WHITE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Jamal N. Whitehead, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 5, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, GOULD, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Miguel Albarran (“Albarran”) appeals the district court’s dismissal

of his federal habeas petition as untimely, contending he should be entitled to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). equitable tolling. We review de novo, Smith v. Davis, 953 F.3d 582, 587 (9th Cir.

2020) (en banc), and we affirm.

Albarran was initially convicted of second-degree rape for assaulting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.