Albarran
Albarran v. White
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 9 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MIGUEL ALBARRAN, No. 24-2758 D.C. No. Petitioner - Appellant, 3:22-cv-05788-JNW v.
MEMORANDUM*
DAN WHITE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Jamal N. Whitehead, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 5, 2025** Seattle, Washington
Before: HAWKINS, GOULD, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Appellant Miguel Albarran (“Albarran”) appeals the district court’s dismissal
of his federal habeas petition as untimely, contending he should be entitled to
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). equitable tolling. We review de novo, Smith v. Davis, 953 F.3d 582, 587 (9th Cir.
2020) (en banc), and we affirm.