People v. Palacios CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 9, 2025H051771California2,079 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lie, J.

I. BACKGROUND2

A. The Operative Information

In June 2021, the Santa Clara County District Attorney charged Palacios by information with a total of 17 counts committed against two minors, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2: two counts of lewd or lascivious acts on a child under age 14 (§ 288, subd. (a); counts 1–2); four counts of lewd or lascivious acts on a child by force (§ 288, subd. (b)(1); counts 3–5 & 10); three counts of rape by force (§ 261, subd. (a)(2); counts 6, 11, 14); one count of sodomy by force (§ 286, subd. (c)(2); count 7), three counts of oral copulation by force (§ 288a, subd. (c)(2); counts 8, 12, 15); three counts of sexual penetration by force (§ 289, subd. (a)(1); counts 9, 13, 16), and a count of witness dissuasion by force (§ 136.1, subd. (c)(1); count 17). The information specifically alleged that Palacios was subject to enhanced indeterminate terms for counts 1 through 16 under the One Strike law (25 years to life under section 667.61, subdivision (j)(2) for counts 1 and 2, and 15 years to life under section 667.61, subdivisions (b) and (e) for counts 3 through 16). B. The Plea and Sentencing

In July 2023, Palacios entered a plea of no contest to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.