Dinnerman
Dinnerman v. Datto, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 10 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSHUA DAVID DINNERMAN; PAUL No. 24-5830 FEINBERG, individually and on behalf of D.C. No. all others similarly situated; PACIFIC 8:23-cv-02301-JLS-DFM INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, an Arizona corporation; PACIFIC BUSINESS MEMORANDUM*
KK; TECHNOLOGY DESIGN SYSTEMS,
LTD., a Hong Kong corporation,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
DATTO, INC., a Connecticut corporation, as such has a regional office in Irvine, CA; OPEN-MESH INC, an Oregon corporation,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 6, 2025** Pasadena, California
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: HURWITZ, MILLER, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.