Dinnerman

Dinnerman v. Datto, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 202524-5830California782 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSHUA DAVID DINNERMAN; PAUL No. 24-5830 FEINBERG, individually and on behalf of D.C. No. all others similarly situated; PACIFIC 8:23-cv-02301-JLS-DFM INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, an Arizona corporation; PACIFIC BUSINESS MEMORANDUM*

KK; TECHNOLOGY DESIGN SYSTEMS,

LTD., a Hong Kong corporation,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

DATTO, INC., a Connecticut corporation, as such has a regional office in Irvine, CA; OPEN-MESH INC, an Oregon corporation,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 6, 2025** Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: HURWITZ, MILLER, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Joshua…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.