Bullock

Bullock v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 202523-3671California928 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONNA BULLOCK, No. 23-3671 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-00360-MLP v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Michelle L. Peterson, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 6, 2025 ** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, GOULD, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Donna Bullock appeals the district court’s decision affirming the

Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her applications for disability

insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

1. The administrative law judge (“ALJ”) is required…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.