Beatty

Beatty v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 202524-2882California902 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KRAIG O. BEATTY, No. 24-2882 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:23-cv-05417-GJL v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Grady J. Leupold, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 6, 2025 ** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, GOULD, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Kraig Beatty appeals the district court’s decision to affirm the Commissioner

of Social Security’s denial of his claim for disability benefits. We affirm.

We review “the district court’s order affirming the [administrative law judge’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“ALJ”)] denial of social security benefits de novo, and we will not overturn…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.