Estate of William Hayden Schuck v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20253:23-cv-00785California1,639 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ESTATE OF WILLIAM HAYDEN Case No.: 3:23-cv-00785-DMS-AHG SCHUCK, et al., ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiffs, DENYING IN PART JOINT

MOTION TO CONTINUE

v. MANDATORY SETTLEMENT COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., CONFERENCE AND VACATE

REMAINING PRETRIAL

Defendants. DEADLINES

18 [ECF No. 113] 19 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to modify the scheduling order. ECF No. 113. The parties seek an order from the Court continuing the Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”), which is presently set for September 24, 2025, and vacating all remaining pretrial deadlines, including the October 3, 2025, pretrial conference and the November 3, 2025, trial. Id. Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); ECF No. 105 at 4…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.