Richards

Richards v. Mueller

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20253:23-cv-03421California3,705 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 L.R., Case No. 23-cv-03421-PHK

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT

v. TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

ROBERT MUELLER, et al., Re: Dkt. 1 Defendants.

13 Pro se Plaintiff L.R. brings this lawsuit against seventy-seven named and unnamed defendants, asserting claims predicated on the following verbatim text: “18USC 1341 [sic]; 18USC 242 inter alia [sic], fraud and fraud in the inducement, this is not a social security case, THIS ARROSE [sic] OUT OF FRAUD IN THE SSA!” [Dkt. 1 at 1]. The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s financial application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). [Dkt. 7]. The Court now analyzes whether Plaintiff’s Complaint satisfies the mandatory screening requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). LEGAL STANDARD Any complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.