Anderson

(PC) Shareef v. Anderson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20251:23-cv-01445California2,009 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ABDUR SHAREEF, No. 1:23-cv-01445-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND

v. DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS

ANDERSON, et al., Doc. 16 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Abdur Shareef is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff initiated this action on October 6, 2023. Doc. 1. The assigned magistrate judge screened the complaint, found only one claim to be cognizable, and allowed plaintiff to either proceed on that claim or to file a first amended complaint. Doc. 14. On June 17, 2024, plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. Doc. 15. On June 17, 2024, the magistrate judge screened the first amended complaint and issued findings and recommendations recommending…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.