Rose
Rose v. Convergint Technologies LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZACHERY ROSE, an individual, Case No.: 25-cv-00851-H-SBC
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
v. MOTION TO SUBMIT PLAINTIFF’S
CLAIMS TO ARBITRATION
CONVERGINT TECHNOLOGIES LLC;
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, [Doc. Nos. 6, 16.] Defendants.
17 On May 2, 2025, Defendant Convergint Technologies LLC (“Convergint”) filed a 18 motion to compel arbitration. (Doc. No. 6.) On May 22, 2025, Plaintiff Zachery Rose filed 19 a response in opposition to Defendant’s motion to compel. (Doc. No. 13.) On May 29, 20 2025, Defendant filed a reply. (Doc. No. 14.) On June 6, 2025, the parties filed a joint 21 motion to submit all of Plaintiff’s claims to binding arbitration and to stay the proceedings. 22 (Doc. No. 16.) 23 The Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) permits “[a] party aggrieved by the alleged 24 failure, neglect, or refusal of another to arbitrate under a written agreement for arbitration 25 [to] petition any United States district court .…