(PC) McClung v. CA Board of State and Community Corrections

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRADLEY JAMES McCLUNG, No. 2:22-cv-01740 TLN SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA BOARD OF STATE AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the undersigned is plaintiff’s third amended complaint (“TAC”) for screening (ECF No. 30) and request for reasonable accommodations (ECF No. 32). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned finds that the TAC states a cognizable Fourteenth Amendment claim regarding the amount of daily in-cell confinement against defendant Placer County and defendants Powers and Bell in their official capacities, but no other cognizable claims. Further, plaintiff’s request for reasonable accommodations is denied without prejudice. LEGAL STANDARDS I. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints The court is required to screen complaints…