Harrill

Harrill v. Emanuel Medical Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20252:23-cv-01672California8,315 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUDITH HARRILL, No. 2:23-cv-01672-DC-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

EMANUEL MEDICAL CENTER, et al., (Doc. No. 27) Defendants.

16 This matter is before the court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s class action complaint. (Doc. No. 27.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the pending motion was taken under submission to be decided on the papers. (Doc. No. 31.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss. BACKGROUND On August 10, 2023, Plaintiff Judith Harrill filed a class action complaint against Defendants Emanuel Medical Center (“EMC”) and Tenet Health (“Tenet”) (collectively, “Defendants”) for allegedly intercepting and transmitting her protected health information (“PHI”) and personally identifiable information (“PII”) to Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”), ///// ///// ///// formerly known as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.