Ahadzia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL FOUST, No. 24-cv-00950 DC SCR P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AHMAD AHADZIA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 15, 2025, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations that plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. (ECF No. 64 at 5.) The undersigned determined that plaintiff “brought an action on three or more prior occasions that count as strikes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g),” a statute that includes a “three strikes rule” to prevent incarcerated people from repeatedly filing meritless lawsuits, and did not plausibly allege he faced imminent danger of serious physical injury. (Id. at 2-4.) District Judge Coggins adopted the findings and recommendations in full on…