Robinson

(PC) Laster v. Robinson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20252:25-cv-00966California1,076 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEVI DALE LASTER, JR., Case No. 2:25-cv-0966-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANGEL R. ROBINSON, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding pro se, alleges in his second amended complaint that six individuals have violated his Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Amendment rights by robbing him, attacking him, and calling the police on him. ECF No. 17. The allegations fail to state a claim. I will give plaintiff a final opportunity to amend his complaint before recommending dismissal. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.