Carrillo

Carrillo v. Monterey Mechanical Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20253:24-cv-09202California6,360 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VINCENT CARRILLO, Case No. 24-cv-09202-LJC

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO

v. REMAND

MONTEREY MECHANICAL CO., Re: Dkt. No. 14 Defendant.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Vincent Carrillo asserts wage-and-hour claims against Defendant Monterey Mechanical Co. (Monterey) on behalf of himself and a putative class of similarly situated employees. Monterey removed the case from the California Superior Court for Santa Clara County, arguing that Carrillo’s state law claims are preempted by the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), and Carrillo moves to remand. The Court previously found the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and now DENIES the Motion to Remand.1 II. BACKGROUND Carrillo asserts the following claims against Monterey: (1) failure to pay minimum wage and compensation for all hours worked as required by sections 204 and 1194 of the California Labor Code, Compl.2 ¶¶ 32–41; (2) failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.