Hugh

(PC) Gaviola Patron v. Hugh

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20251:24-cv-00655California2,407 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 D’ANNUNZIO ROMAN GAVIOLA No. 1:24-cv-00655-JLT-SAB (PC)

PATRON,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION Plaintiff, TO COMPEL AND REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF WITNESS SUBPOENAS, v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

C. MARES, et al., (ECF Nos. 49, 50)

Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery and request for issuance of witness subpoenas, filed May 12, 2025 and May 21, 2025. (ECF Nos. 49, 50.) Defendants Herrera and Mares (collectively hereinafter “County Defendants”) filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to compel on May 23, 2025. (ECF No. 51.) Plaintiff has not filed a reply and the time to do so has passed. Local Rule 230(l). /// /// /// 28 I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.