Doty
Doty v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 JAMES R. DOTY, Case No. 24-cv-04829-YGR (RMI)
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON JOINT LETTER BRIEF
v. Re: Dkt. No. 36 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
OF AMERICA,
12 Defendant. 13 Before the court is the parties’ Joint Letter Brief (dkt 36), wherein Defendant Unum Life Insurance Company of America (“Unum”) asserts that Plaintiff James Doty has failed to supplement deficient discovery responses and document production. Plaintiff disagrees. The court finds these matters suitable for disposition on the papers and will address the issues as they are presented by the parties. RFP Nos. 1-74: Unum states that “Plaintiff’s responses fail to state whether all responsive, non-privileged documents have been produced, nor do they clarify whether any responsive documents have been withheld based on the asserted objections.” (Dkt. 36, p. 2). Plaintiff evades this straightforward request, instead protesting that “Unum fails to identify…