Sanai

Sanai v. Cardona

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20254:22-cv-01818California1,068 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CYRUS SANAI, Case No. 22-cv-01818-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR

v. INDICATIVE RULING

GEORGE CARDONA, et al., Re: ECF No. 165, 168 Defendants.

12 Before the Court are Plaintiff Cyrus Sanai’s two motions for an indicative ruling on a motion for relief from judgment or order. ECF Nos. 165, 168. The Court will deny both motions. I. BACKGROUND Because the facts are well-known to the parties and the Court has summarized Sanai’s allegations in detail in its prior orders, ECF Nos. 58, 82, the Court will not repeat them in full here. In sum, this closed case concerns the declaratory and injunctive relief that Sanai—a California lawyer—sought against Defendants George Cardona, the State Bar Chief Trial Counsel, and Leah Wilson, the State Bar Executive Director (collectively, “Defendants”), in March 2022, shortly after receiving a letter notifying him that the State Bar would initiate disciplinary proceedings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.