Sanai
Sanai v. Cardona
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CYRUS SANAI, Case No. 22-cv-01818-JST
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR
v. INDICATIVE RULING
GEORGE CARDONA, et al., Re: ECF No. 165, 168 Defendants.
12 Before the Court are Plaintiff Cyrus Sanai’s two motions for an indicative ruling on a motion for relief from judgment or order. ECF Nos. 165, 168. The Court will deny both motions. I. BACKGROUND Because the facts are well-known to the parties and the Court has summarized Sanai’s allegations in detail in its prior orders, ECF Nos. 58, 82, the Court will not repeat them in full here. In sum, this closed case concerns the declaratory and injunctive relief that Sanai—a California lawyer—sought against Defendants George Cardona, the State Bar Chief Trial Counsel, and Leah Wilson, the State Bar Executive Director (collectively, “Defendants”), in March 2022, shortly after receiving a letter notifying him that the State Bar would initiate disciplinary proceedings…