Akkinola

Smith v. Akkinola

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20251:25-cv-00418California1,514 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:25-cv-00418-KES-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE MERCY AYODELE AKKINOLA, et al. FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Candace Smith proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action. (Doc. Nos. 1, 3). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends the District Court dismiss this action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action and/or comply with a court order. BACKGROUND On April 10, 2025, Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a pro se “Complaint for a Civil Case” form. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint’). On April 22, 2025, the undersigned issued a screening order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), finding the Complaint failed to establish this Court had jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s claims and failed to state a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.