Hodroff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA || Matthew HODROFF, Case No.: 25-cv-0041-AGS-JLB Plant ORDER REMANDING CASE TO 5 || V- STATE COURT 6 || JEPMORGAN CHASE BANK, et al., Defendants. 8 This Court previously dismissed plaintiff Matthew Hodroff’s sole federal claim and 10 || gave him until June 9, 2025, to amend his complaint. (See ECF 11.) Hodroff has not filed amended complaint, and the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over ||his state claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). “In the usual case in which all federal-law claims eliminated before trial, the balance of factors to be considered under the pendent jurisdiction doctrine—judicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comity—will point 15 || toward declining to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims.” Sanford v. 16 || MemberWorks, Inc., 625 F.3d 550, 561 (9th Cir. 2010). This case is thus REMANDED to Superior Court of California, County of …