Marin

Marin v. The People's Republic of China

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20253:25-cv-01408California1,258 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Mel MARIN, Case No.: 25-cv-1408-AGS-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. IFP MOTION (ECF 2), DENYING AS

MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

LEAVE TO FILE (ECF 3), AND

as an alter ego of Shandong Potence DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT Sporting Goods, Co., et al.,

WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

8 Defendants.

Plaintiff Mel Marin, representing himself, moves to proceed without paying the court-filing fees in this products-defect case. A. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Typically, parties instituting a civil action in a United States district court must pay $405 in filing fees.1 See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). But if granted the right to proceed in forma pauperis, a plaintiff can proceed without prepaying those fees. Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). Plaintiff here has an average monthly income of “$1,350,” which does not cover his $1,540 in total monthly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.