(PC) Louprasong v. San Joaquin County Jail Recreational

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20252:24-cv-03416California1,022 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMPHONE LOUPRASONG, Case No. 2:24-cv-3416-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

Y. SALINAS GOLZALEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding pro se, requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis and submitted an affidavit in support of his application, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). ECF No. 2. Because plaintiff’s affidavit and trust account demonstrated that he sufficient funds to cover the filing fee and still afford the necessities of life, I directed plaintiff to file a response stating why he should be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff failed to comply with that order, so, on January 24, 2025, I ordered plaintiff to show cause for why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with court orders. ECF No. 5. In response, plaintiff filed a motion seeking appointment of counsel. ECF No. 6. I denied that motion and allowed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.