Napoles

Napoles v. Amazon.com Services LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20252:24-cv-03313California1,419 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

BACKGROUND

23 On October 18, 2024, plaintiff filed his complaint initiating this action in the Sacramento 24 County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 1-3.) Defendant removed the action to this federal court on 25 November 27, 2024. (Doc. No. 1.) 26 The full extent of plaintiff’s non-conclusory factual allegations provided in his complaint 27 are as follows: Plaintiff is an individual who resides in California; plaintiff has received a Right 28 to Sue letter from the California Civil Rights Department and has thus exhausted all necessary administrative remedies. (Doc. No. 1-3 at ¶¶ 1, 12.) Each of plaintiff’s other allegations is entirely conclusory. (See generally Doc. No. 1-3.) For instance, plaintiff provides the following allegation at the start of the “Factual Background” section of his complaint: Defendants subjected Plaintiff to discrimination / harassment / retaliation on the bases of race /color / ancestry / national origin, marital status, disability, request for and exercise of reasonable accommodation, request for and exercise of medical leave, opposition to discrimination / harassment /…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.