Corralejo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD ANDROSHCHUK, Case No. 2:25-cv-0397-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER B. CORRALEJO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state inmate, brings this § 1983 action and concurrently has applied to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. I reviewed his trust fund account statement, and it determined that plaintiff appeared to have sufficient funds to cover the filing fee and still afford the necessities of life. Id. But before recommending that plaintiff’s application be denied, on April 22, 2025, I granted him twenty-one days to explain why he could not both pay the filing fee and still afford his necessities. To date, plaintiff has not complied with that order. To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissal of a case, for failure to comply with court orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon…