Hamrick

United States v. Hamrick

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 11, 202524-2813California797 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 11 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-2813 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:20-cr-00079-RAJ-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

JODI HAMRICK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 6, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, GOULD, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Defendant Jodi Hamrick appeals her conviction and sentence for Wire Fraud,

Aggravated Identity Theft, and Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud and Aggravated

Identity Theft. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 1028A, 371. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) and affirm.

1. Hamrick argues her conviction should be vacated because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.