People v. Shannon CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 11, 2025C099895California4,367 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/11/25 P. v. Shannon CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Siskiyou) ----

THE PEOPLE, C099895

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No.

SCCR-CRF-2021-545)

v.

JUSTIN BUCK SHANNON,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury found defendant Justin Buck Shannon guilty of 13 sex offenses involving three victims. On appeal, defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to prove one of those convictions—rape of an unconscious person—and asserts the trial court should have severed that charge, which involved an adult victim, in a case where the other charges involved minor victims. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

By the time of trial, Doe 1 had passed away, leaving her mother and a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.