Bisignano
Rogers v. Bisignano
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 11 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIAH N. ROGERS, No. 24-3087 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:23-cv-05699-BAT v.
MEMORANDUM*
FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Brian A. Tsuchida, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 9, 2025** Portland, Oregon
Before: TALLMAN, OWENS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Mariah Noele Rogers (“Rogers”) appeals from the district court’s order
affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of her application for
disability benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1382c(a)(3). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.