Bisignano

Rogers v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 11, 202524-3087California877 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 11 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIAH N. ROGERS, No. 24-3087 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:23-cv-05699-BAT v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Brian A. Tsuchida, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 9, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: TALLMAN, OWENS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Mariah Noele Rogers (“Rogers”) appeals from the district court’s order

affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of her application for

disability benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1382c(a)(3). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We review a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.