Chinchilla-Jimenez

Chinchilla-Jimenez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 11, 202523-2709California568 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULISSA MARIA CHINCHILLA- No. 23-2709 JIMENEZ; Z. G.-C., Agency Nos.

A201-544-054

Petitioners, A201-544-055 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 9, 2025 **

Before: SANCHEZ, H.A. THOMAS, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Julissa Chinchilla-Jimenez (“Chinchilla-Jimenez”) and her minor daughter,

both natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing an appeal from an immigration

judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 1 Where, as here, the BIA cites Matter of

Burbano, 20 I. & N. Dec. 872 (BIA 1994), conducts its own review of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.