People v. Goodenough CA3
Opinion
Krause, J.
DISCUSSION
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts and procedural history of the case and asks this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days from the date the opening brief was filed. More than 30 days have elapsed, and defendant has not filed a supplemental brief.
The notice of appeal references only case No. CR2024-0137. However, since case Nos. CR2023-0609 and CR2024-0137 were joined for purposes of sentencing, the trial court issued a joint abstract of judgment, and the augmented record includes the reporter’s and clerk’s transcript for case No. CR2023-0609, we construe the notice of appeal to include both cases. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.100 (a)(2).)
3 Having undertaken an examination of the entire record pursuant to Wende and finding no errors that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we will affirm the judgment.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
\s\ , Krause, J.
We concur:
\s\ , Mauro, Acting P. J.
\s\ , Duarte, J.
4