Trunick

Trunick v. Callaway CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 11, 2025F086766California3,591 words

Opinion

Opinion

Snauffer, J.

Filed 6/11/25 Trunick v. Callaway CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

SHELLEY TRUNICK, as Co-Trustee, etc., et al.,

F086766

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. BPB-18-002894) v.

RICHARD CALLAWAY, OPINION Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Kern County. Brett V. Myers, Commissioner. Dake, Braun & Monge, Craig N. Braun; Darling & Wilson and Joshua G. Wilson for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Ventura Coast Law, Kymberley E. Peck; Ferguson Case Orr Paterson and Wendy C. Lascher for Defendant and Respondent. -ooOoo- This appeal arises from probate litigation related to a trust created by the Callaway family for Callaway family members. Two beneficiaries of the trust (siblings Richard…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.